Summary of: continuing development of an oral health score for clinical audit.
Identifieur interne : 000208 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000207; suivant : 000209Summary of: continuing development of an oral health score for clinical audit.
Auteurs : Paul Brunton [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- British dental journal [ 1476-5373 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- méthodes : Audit clinique.
- normes : Santé buccodentaire.
- Humains.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Clinical Audit.
- standards : Oral Health.
- Humans.
Abstract
AIM
To compare the outcomes of a contemporary oral health status (OHS) scoring system with national oral health data from the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey, and to explore the utility of the OHS in audit and service development.
METHODS
An OHS scoring system was developed as part of a previously reported comprehensive on-line patient assessment tool. The assessment tool also measured future disease risk and indicative capitation fee grading. The modified OHS score component was developed over 20 years of research and experience from the original Oral Health Index (Burke and Wilson 1995). The online tool was piloted by 25 volunteer dentists on 640 recall patients and qualitative and quantitative feedback provided. Anonymised data from the inputs and scores generated were collected centrally and analysed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
The modified OHS was reported to have good validity by the pilot group. Submitted data confirmed a mean age for the recall patients examined as 53 ± 15.8 years and an average oral health status score of 79.5 ± 10.8 where a score of 100 equates to perfect oral health. A breakdown of the scores into the eight principal components provided evidence of cross validation with the Adult Dental Health Survey (2009).
CONCLUSIONS
Scoring oral health status electronically offers valuable opportunities for clinical audit. The reported benchmark oral health score of 79.5 for recall patients can be updated as increased numbers of patients enter the centralised data recording system. Audit can be facilitated by this move from a paper-based system to an on-line tool with central data collection.
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.380
PubMed: 24809572
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Summary of: continuing development of an oral health score for clinical audit.</title><author><name sortKey="Brunton, Paul" sort="Brunton, Paul" uniqKey="Brunton P" first="Paul" last="Brunton">Paul Brunton</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>The University of Leeds, Dental Institute.</nlm:affiliation><orgName type="university">Université de Leeds</orgName><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Leeds</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Yorkshire-et-Humber</region></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24809572</idno><idno type="pmid">24809572</idno><idno type="doi">10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.380</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000208</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000208</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000208</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000208</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000208</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Summary of: continuing development of an oral health score for clinical audit.</title><author><name sortKey="Brunton, Paul" sort="Brunton, Paul" uniqKey="Brunton P" first="Paul" last="Brunton">Paul Brunton</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>The University of Leeds, Dental Institute.</nlm:affiliation><orgName type="university">Université de Leeds</orgName><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Leeds</settlement><region type="country">Angleterre</region><region type="région" nuts="1">Yorkshire-et-Humber</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">British dental journal</title><idno type="eISSN">1476-5373</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical Audit (methods)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Oral Health (standards)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Audit clinique (méthodes)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Santé buccodentaire (normes)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Clinical Audit</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Audit clinique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Santé buccodentaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Oral Health</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Humans</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>AIM</b></p><p>To compare the outcomes of a contemporary oral health status (OHS) scoring system with national oral health data from the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey, and to explore the utility of the OHS in audit and service development.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>An OHS scoring system was developed as part of a previously reported comprehensive on-line patient assessment tool. The assessment tool also measured future disease risk and indicative capitation fee grading. The modified OHS score component was developed over 20 years of research and experience from the original Oral Health Index (Burke and Wilson 1995). The online tool was piloted by 25 volunteer dentists on 640 recall patients and qualitative and quantitative feedback provided. Anonymised data from the inputs and scores generated were collected centrally and analysed using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>The modified OHS was reported to have good validity by the pilot group. Submitted data confirmed a mean age for the recall patients examined as 53 ± 15.8 years and an average oral health status score of 79.5 ± 10.8 where a score of 100 equates to perfect oral health. A breakdown of the scores into the eight principal components provided evidence of cross validation with the Adult Dental Health Survey (2009).</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>Scoring oral health status electronically offers valuable opportunities for clinical audit. The reported benchmark oral health score of 79.5 for recall patients can be updated as increased numbers of patients enter the centralised data recording system. Audit can be facilitated by this move from a paper-based system to an on-line tool with central data collection.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" IndexingMethod="Automated" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24809572</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2016</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>02</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1476-5373</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>216</Volume><Issue>9</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>British dental journal</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Br Dent J</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Summary of: continuing development of an oral health score for clinical audit.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>526-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.380</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="AIM" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare the outcomes of a contemporary oral health status (OHS) scoring system with national oral health data from the 2009 Adult Dental Health Survey, and to explore the utility of the OHS in audit and service development.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">An OHS scoring system was developed as part of a previously reported comprehensive on-line patient assessment tool. The assessment tool also measured future disease risk and indicative capitation fee grading. The modified OHS score component was developed over 20 years of research and experience from the original Oral Health Index (Burke and Wilson 1995). The online tool was piloted by 25 volunteer dentists on 640 recall patients and qualitative and quantitative feedback provided. Anonymised data from the inputs and scores generated were collected centrally and analysed using descriptive statistics.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The modified OHS was reported to have good validity by the pilot group. Submitted data confirmed a mean age for the recall patients examined as 53 ± 15.8 years and an average oral health status score of 79.5 ± 10.8 where a score of 100 equates to perfect oral health. A breakdown of the scores into the eight principal components provided evidence of cross validation with the Adult Dental Health Survey (2009).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Scoring oral health status electronically offers valuable opportunities for clinical audit. The reported benchmark oral health score of 79.5 for recall patients can be updated as increased numbers of patients enter the centralised data recording system. Audit can be facilitated by this move from a paper-based system to an on-line tool with central data collection.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brunton</LastName><ForeName>Paul</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The University of Leeds, Dental Institute.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016420">Comment</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Br Dent J</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7513219</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0007-0610</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentOn"><RefSource>Br Dent J. 2014 May;216(9):E20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24809589</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054869" MajorTopicYN="N">Clinical Audit</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009909" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Health</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24809572</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">sj.bdj.2014.380</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.380</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Br Dent J. 2014 May;216(9):E20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24809589</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country><region><li>Angleterre</li><li>Yorkshire-et-Humber</li></region><settlement><li>Leeds</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Leeds</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><region name="Angleterre"><name sortKey="Brunton, Paul" sort="Brunton, Paul" uniqKey="Brunton P" first="Paul" last="Brunton">Paul Brunton</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SuicidDentistV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000208 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000208 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= SuicidDentistV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24809572
|texte= Summary of: continuing development of an oral health score for clinical audit.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24809572" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SuicidDentistV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |  |